Riyadh 20 dead in 3 explosions (or is that 4.. or more?)
Powell says "killing... people who are trying to help others" as if foreigners in Riyadh are some sort of charity workers. So how many are there for no pay? Does 'Military advisor' or 'an employee of Saudi Snack Foods' count as 'helping'?. Maybe a bomb counts as 'helping people' to see that they shouldn't be there. Does USAnian use of language have any meaning anymore?
Poor Powell, actually having to smell the "pungent stench" (NYT 13May03)
Maybe Colin'll sympathise with Baghdadians whose water,electric & sewage dont yet work.
Or maybe hes just happy how many of Rummie's guys have fallen flat and been pulled back, even that woman they tried to put as overlord of central Iraq.
Usama had a deal with the Saudi Royals - no bangs inside the kingdom. Looks like that deal may be off. Or maybe the bombs are USAnian? Feelin the urge for more massacrees? I find it hard to believe the USAnians could coordinate 4 simultaneous raids anywhere...Maybe it was Stakeknife...
Rightwing sites:
Typical USAnian rightist site: rabbiting on about guns and abortions and boycotMikeMoore but seemingly
no concern for USA civil rights vanishing - so what the hell are conservatives good for?
so far their only use is to point to debka (below)
freep dont defend liberties
Zionista rant BUT has the best news on the Riyadh attacks
they are reporting 91 dead (12:22 14May03) while the NYT says "at least 20"
and interesting news on the land of the two temples...
debka: zionistas but good scoops
_______________________________________________________
<< Home